Toxic pollutants in vaccines: dr. Montanari and Dr. Gatti
Vaccines have undesirable effects, which have always been known, and reported in the literature. The fact that many "ignore" them does not mean that they "disappear".
In a recent study published in theInternational Journal of Vaccines and Vaccinations, however, Dr. Gatti and Dr. Montanari point out that lately these have increased both in number and in severity, especially in children, as also denounced by theAmerican Academy of Pediatrics. In addition to the more common and known symptoms such as fever, irritability, headache, etc. others are emerging affecting the nervous system and brain. Those responsible are mainly the adjuvants added to the vaccine itself, which in most cases correspond to aluminum salts.
It is a fact that every day millions of doses of vaccines are administered without problems (God for that!), but in the same way it is irrefutable that in a limited number of cases something bad happens and most of the time it is not registered, thus remaining unknown.
This premise is what prompted the two authors to further investigate the side effects of the vaccines, but using a point of view that had not yet been adopted before: no longer biological but chemical-physical! They then developed a particular analytical technique with which they went to check for the presence of inorganic contaminants.
The results of the study
A total of 44 vaccines were analysed; some, like that of the flu, were present in multiple batches from the same manufacturer.
The result of the analysis confirmed the presence of inorganic salts (such as table salt, NaCl) and aluminum salts, but micro-, submicro- and nano-molecular compounds have also been detected (with dimensions from 100nm to 10um) in all samples, the presence of which had NOT been declared by the Manufacturer in the leaflet inside the vaccine pack.
The amount of foreign particulate detected left the two researchers baffled, especially since the inorganic materials identified are neither biocompatible nor biodegradable, but bioresistant (that is, they are in no way modified / disposed of by the body).
It goes without saying that these are toxic compounds and, as with most foreign bodies, can induce an inflammatory reaction in the body.
Once injected, these particles can remain near the injection site forming swellings and granulomas, but they can also end up in the bloodstream, as hypothesized by the researchers, distributing themselves in a completely random way without any visible effect. Once reaching certain organs (such as the brain) however, bio-accumulation phenomena may occur which, like all particles foreign to the organism, initiate a chronic inflammatory reaction (= stable over time), because these particles CANNOT be degraded.
So you understand what it means to vaccinate a child? You are "giving" him an inflammatory status that will last a lifetime.
The presence of aluminum and NaCl salts in vaccines is justifiable as they are substances used by the Manufacturers and declared (consequently) among the components. But all the others should not be present in a vaccine or in any other injectable preparation, precisely because of their toxicological characteristics.
From a verification of the detected contaminants in all vaccine samples analyzed, in fact, unwanted reactions following their injection are possible and credible, which have the characteristic of being random due to the fact that they depend on the place where they will be transported (and deposited). It goes without saying that the harmful effects are much more serious the smaller the body is, such as that of children.
From a qualitative point of view chemical compounds that the two researchers found in the vaccines examined are similar to those they identified following research into the sources of different environmental pollutants. A bit like those that form when, for example, waste is burned...
In conclusion, the authors suggest that the type of analysis they carried out on vaccines could represent an important new qualitative parameter to improve vaccine safety. The hope, as they themselves hypothesize, is that this is only an "oversight" attributable to polluted industrial components and / or procedures (therefore resolvable with an accurate analysis of the production process) and is not intentional.