At the attack of the law 210? The "government of change" for the worse!

At the attack of the law 210? The "government of change" for the worse!

To ensure that we never miss the good news, we need to deal with the latest document published by the Ministry of Health: the Act of address for the identification of the political priorities for the year 2019

The pdf is downloadable at seg. link: https://goo.gl/dbjhYH

Therefore, among the priorities of our ministry, we read:

- [] obviously PREVENTION. Do you start with lifestyles and nutrition? No, the opening is dedicated to the "prevention of communicable diseases especially of epidemic importance" ... question: these damned epidemics that slander the country with deaths wherever they are?

- [] We continue talking about vaccines on page 7, where we find the reference "to the activity envisaged by the PNPV (National Vaccinal Prevention Plan) 2017/2019, in all its contents, giving importance to the importance of vaccination prevention ALONG THE ENTIRE ARCH OF LIFE and communication on vaccinations, aimed at strengthening the informed choice of citizens on the subject and increasing the spread of the VACCINATION CULTURE (immunization literacy), taking into account the provisions dictated by the DECREE LAW 7 JUNE 2017 N.73 ( the Lorenzin law)) WITHOUT neglecting the international side in which the country is engaged ".

Translated: continue to persevere on the road traced by the previous legislature. Too bad, from the government of change we would expect some break on the issue that has been so dear to current lawmakers, namely the freedom of choice in the vaccination field ...

Reading these lines one wonders if Minister Grillo is really the same person that in 2017, just about that decree law mentioned here, spoke of oligopoly in the vaccine market by a few large pharmaceutical companies, of a large market of 23 billion / year in constant growth, antitrust reports, economic and commercial reasons in the DL73 proposal ... but even more recently, the same person who in June of this year intervened in a well-known television program declaring that there should be everyone the costs a discontinuity with the work of Beatrice Lorenzin!

Then the question arises: if you consider the discontinuity with respect to what was promulgated by the previous executive absolutely necessary, why does the DL73 even fit into a document in which - honestly - you could very well do without mentioning it? Yes, we read that the conscious choice must be strengthened, but immediately afterwards the due reference is made to the mandatory introduced in 2017. No mention instead of the desire to reformulate the mandatory or want to follow up on other legislative proposals, reopen the dialogue, review certain positions ... nothing.

- [] Finally, the icing on the cake arrives on page 33, where there is to be wide eyes reading that the compensation and compensation are now obsolete, yes you understand correctly, it is necessary to review (this time yes) the current legislation in favor of those damaged by compulsory vaccinations (and blood transfusions), because, after hearing, medicine has made great strides! Today those who suffer damage can be cured and therefore it no longer makes sense to give compensation for life ... I will let you read this passage with your eyes in the image below.

In short, if you happen to get the hepatitis C from transfusion, or to be the unfortunate UNOSUUNMILIONE (I'm ironic) that gets damage from the vaccine, no problem: medicine runs to your aid (the State does not do much).

Among other things, I honestly regret having relegated the only mention of those affected by vaccine to the chapter "Policies for management efficiency". It would have been nice to at least pretend to worry about the issue of vaccine safety (given the mandatory nature of the issue, and the numerous scientific studies that raise questions on it) making a minimal or veiled hint. For example in chapter 2, dedicated to communication, where they inform us that "among the various issues, the promotion of information on vaccinations is particularly noteworthy", inserting something like "information on benefits AND RISKS" of the same would have been a good way to give a signal of discontinuity ... Above all because of the fact that among the Italian laws there are also some that foresee how any sanitary act must be accompanied by a little thing called "informed consent", or the fact that in law 210 It is expected that the local health authorities, and consequently the Ministry, will also take care of providing information on the risks associated with vaccinations ... Instead no, as we know since 2017, the damage from vaccine has become "fake news", and there is no change here it is a trace, indeed it also pays attention to the last protection of citizenship that tomorrow, deprived of the right to health, may also be deprived of the right compensation.

Unfortunately, for some time now we have denounced the ever-increasing difficulty in having vaccine damage recognized and obtaining the relative compensation, difficulties that make this type of compensation already a chimera, but it is evident that it is not enough: the vaccine damage must simply disappear, and to do it the most comfortable and easy way is to hide it, not recognize it, pretend it doesn't exist.

I would like to dedicate a small parenthesis to the part of the document (chapter 6) which describes the "New Health Information and Statistical System" (NSIS). We are told that this was created to "make an individual-centered data asset available" and that all information on the individual's contacts with the NHS (hospitalizations, first aid etc.) is collected by making available to the Ministry a " information heritage "(the use of the word heritage repeated twice in a few lines stands out) and that all this" will allow us to intercept the path followed by the patient in the face of a healthcare need "... Here, in a climate of health dictatorship more and more evident, with the witch hunt taking place both on the vaccine level and on the level of freedom of choice of treatment (from homeopathy to herbal medicine to all the so-called alternative treatments) this has a not-so-disturbing…