Do you want to know what compulsory vaccination really means in Italy? We give you an emblematic example, based on numerous testimonies and therefore which has become a consolidated model in our local health authorities: imagine a child between 3 and 6 years old, perhaps vaccinated in the past. For various reasons this child receives a vaccination deferral or exemption, a medical document drawn up by a specialist and confirmed by the pediatrician, which prescribes postponing or stopping further vaccinations for health reasons. This specialist is a doctor registered with the Medical Association, as well as the pediatrician who, with science and conscience, certifies the need to postpone or stop vaccination for well-documented reasons. Here, despite this, this child will almost certainly be excluded from nursery school because he is not vaccinated! Yes, you read correctly, the opinion of two doctors does not count as much as that of the ASL vaccination doctor who, thanks to the Guide to contraindications to vaccinations, drawn up in 2018, can easily refuse any exemption and this is considered an unquestionable opinion given that it will then be the ASL that sends the list of those enrolled with the famous defaulters to the individual schools.
Everyone can be vaccinated practically always and in any case, this is the leitmotif. There is no single case, there is no possibility of evaluating a personalization of the vaccination, perhaps with an extension of the time or, why not, a total exemption for proven health reasons. None of this is possible in the world of "let's vaccinate car bumpers too". This situation happens today as it did in 2017 and is the emblem of mandatory vaccination. With the obligation the doctor becomes a bureaucrat and vaccination a mere bureaucratic question, devoid of science and medicine and we tell you more: in cases where the danger linked to vaccination is clear, perhaps due to an anaphylactic shock which occurred during the previous vaccination , in the luckiest cases vaccination is offered in a protected location, perhaps with a short hospital stay in order to have intensive care ready if necessary. In short, always vaccinate!
But it's not over. Now think if, for a thousand reasons that we certainly cannot judge, the family had proceeded with the vaccination despite having had two doctors who warned of the potential danger: in the event of damage, the State takes over, the State that first imposed the vaccination on you. vaccination and then created that system in which any exemption must be refused? Not even a dream! From now on you only have one certainty: you will be alone.
Now someone may argue that vaccines are safe and exemptions are useless and in reality this is the common thought of the majority of doctors. The example above is indeed dictated by an enormous number of testimonies that have come down to us over time, but it is also an anomaly. Almost no doctor will risk their job for your or your child's health when it comes to vaccination. The exemptions come with a dropper but the question is: is this really how it should be?
To answer this question we must make use of official data and then the final report of the Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry, called "Impoverished uranium", of February 2018. From an in-depth analysis of the technical data sheets provided to the Commission by the main producers of vaccines for civilian use, it emerged that the producers themselves suggest checking for the presence of pathologies or allergies before carrying out the vaccination and therefore advise against continue in the event of the presence of certain medical situations, those same medical situations that are practically never considered valid.
Let's get to the list of requirements dictated by the producers themselves, those who theoretically know their products well:
- Endogenous or iatrogenic immunosuppression (7 vaccines)
- Congenital immunosuppression (3 vaccines)
- Idiopathic immunosuppression (2 vaccines)
- Immunosuppressive therapy (10 vaccines)
- Immunodeficiency (6 vaccines)
- HIV positive subject (1 vaccine)
- Humoral or cellular immunodeficiency (3 vaccines)
- Congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency (1 vaccine)
- Autoimmune disease (1 vaccine)
- Thrombocytopenia (2 vaccines)
- Malignant solid tumors (2 vaccines)
- Malignant neoplasms of the hematopoietic and lymphatic system (1 vaccine)
- Lymphomas of any type (1 vaccine)
- Leukemia (1 vaccine)
- Antimitotic drugs (1 vaccine)
- Radiotherapy (2 vaccines)
- Thyma (1 vaccine)
- Qualitative test for antibodies (2 vaccines)
- Antibody production effectively (1 vaccine)
- Weakened immune system (2 vaccines)
- Serological tests (2 vaccines)
- Acute gastrointestinal diseases (1 vaccine)
- Acute febrile illnesses (8 vaccines)
- Low sodium diet (1 vaccine)
- Bleeding disorders (1 vaccine)
- Neurological disorders (1 vaccine)
- Epilepsy (1 vaccine)
- Hemophilia (1 vaccine)
- Coagulation disorders (1 vaccine)
- Bleeding disorders (2 vaccines)
- Brain disease (1 vaccine)
- Acute severe febrile illness (3 vaccines)
- Other forms of Hepatitis (1 vaccine)
- Hepatitis A incubation (2 vaccines)
- Hemodialysis (2 vaccines)
- Kidney failure (1 vaccine)
- Cytotoxic drugs (2 vaccines)
- Thymectomy (1 vaccine)
- Thymic dysfunction (1 vaccine)
- Acute gastrointestinal infections (1 vaccine)
- Treatment with antibiotics or sulfonamides (1 vaccine)
- Febrile illnesses (5 vaccines)
- Acute infection (5 vaccines)
- Central nervous system disorders (1 vaccine)
- Susceptibility to febrile seizures (1 vaccine)
- Neurological complications following vaccination (1 vaccine)
- Severe chronic diseases (1 vaccine)
- Blood dyscrasias (1 vaccine)
- Untreated active tuberculosis (1 vaccine)
To this list should be added those linked to pediatric vaccines, which the commission did not deal with, but this already gives a good idea of the situation. There are 22 indications for carrying out pre-vaccination tests aimed at excluding the existence of any states of immunosuppression, 7 those which involve the preventive evaluation of the efficiency or inefficiency of the immune system, 3 those referring to the need to exclude autoimmune diseases, 9 the oncological diseases and, for various reasons, as many as 11 which require a real analysis of any immunodeficiency and almost none of these pathologies are on average verified by the vaccinating doctor in the few minutes made available between anamnesis and vaccination and this is because we know, not there is time to waste, vaccines are safe anyway.
Corvelva Staff
