Parliamentary Commission "Depleted Uranium"

Parliamentary Commission "Depleted Uranium"

A minute of silence ...

A necessary premise must be made: the Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry "Depleted Uranium" was not born on the particular sensitivity of the Italian rulers but was born in 2015 following a large number of cases of Italian soldiers sick with autoimmune or neoplastic or deceased diseases.
Among them we mention only one of the 2800 cases in which the Ministry of Defense and Health were involved in causing injuries or death from the too close and massive mandatory administration of vaccines.

Francesco Rinaldelli, major corporal of the Italian Army, Alpine of Potenza Picena. Died in 2008 at the age of 25. (Judgment of the Administrative Court of Friuli Venezia-Giulia)


Parliamentary Commission "Depleted Uranium"

Some of the questions that we have been asking for 25 years and that have finally had a parliamentary answer:


Are vaccines safe for our children?

The safety of vaccinations turns out to be a necessary and fundamental certainty for anyone who wants to vaccinate or vaccinate their child, especially in situations of obligation. There are no studies confirming the safety of vaccines1.
The Commission has identified several issues that seriously question the effective safety of any vaccine approved for military and civil use (they are the same vaccines) in the Italian territory, already only if individually inoculated2.
The safety of vaccines administered simultaneously or without waiting for the due disposal times of the adjuvants, excipients and contaminants, causes an exponential increase in the risks related to vaccination3-4-5. The safety of multiple vaccines, contrary to what has been claimed to date by the "medical-political" class, has been questioned by the commission, even going so far as to ask to adopt only monovalent vaccines6-7.
Any form of risk linked to compulsory medical practice, particularly if carried out on healthy children, cannot and must not be hidden, concealed or minimized, as is the practice followed daily by the State, Institutions and indoctrinated Medical Staff.


Are there pre-vaccination tests to prevent adverse reactions?

Is there any way to prevent a serious and moderate adverse reaction in a healthy child?8-9-10
 To date, negative responses have been rained down supported by nothing and arbitrarily decided11-12-13 by those who wanted at all costs to put our families in a critical and uncomfortable situation, in several respects. The Commission noted the importance of clinical pre-vaccination tests to the point of suggesting exclusion from enrollment14 of the subjects who do not pass these tests, underlining the insufficiency of the medical history form and of the informed consent completed by the military during vaccination administration, believing that the mere compilation of the form cannot be considered as a substitute for the health checks required by the manufacturing companies of vaccines.
Consequently, it is reasonable to think that a 3-month history of a baby, based mainly on the possible familiarity of autoimmune diseases, immune depressions or any pathology that could be a risk factor for vaccination, is nowhere near enough15.
But, basically, the pre-vaccination tests suggested by the pharmaceutical companies, for our government and for most of its representatives, do not exist.


Are there serious adverse reactions to vaccines?

The commission notes what we've all been screaming for years. The most honest answer that institutions should give is: "we don't know because we don't monitor"16-17-18 and not only "we hinder spontaneous reporting in every way".
There are too many cases of families devastated by a serious adverse event following vaccination19-20-21 and not everyone has recognized the damage to their children. For these families it is not only a venial economic recognition, albeit useful in various situations, but the recognition of truth and justice; the admission of guilt by a medical and political class that denies the evidence.
Many of these families had not been adequately informed about the risk / benefit of vaccination practice by their pediatrician or even by the vaccinating doctor. The information is retrieved on the Internet and in books, of course! But it is a responsibility of the Order of Doctors and a specific task of any Doctor who defines himself as such, to make sure that his patient is at least aware of the risks he runs by undergoing a medical practice.
The issue is far more serious than you think. The Commission has highlighted the tendency to monitor adverse reactions within a very short period after vaccination22, associating with this reason the higher frequency of immediate adverse reactions compared to longer-term pathologies that are thus rare, declaring in no uncertain terms that non-acute, but not for this reason not serious, adverse reactions are significantly underestimated.
It is not acceptable that in a state that defines itself as civilized human rights are denied. Not so much for an obligation that harms the freedom of the individual, as for the lack of recognition and the lack of support of people who have developed serious illnesses following a strongly recommended and, today, again mandatory practice.


Does the number of vaccines administered affect the health of our children?

They imposed an obligation on us at least 9 vaccines to have our children admitted to kindergartens and nursery schools, stressing that the immunized person fulfills the vaccination obligation ..., normally and in any case within the limits of the availability of the National Health Service, with monocomponent or combined vaccines in which the antigen for the infectious disease for which immunization exists is absent.
Leaving aside the mockery that vaccines in one-component formulation are not available and in combined formulation they do not always exclude the disease for which natural immunization has already occurred, we bring to light the damage.
In recent months the mass media have told us and repeated that there is no risk if a naturally immunized child is vaccinated for that same disease. The Commission brutally refutes this claim by stating that:
"... to pursue the safety of the administration of vaccines, with a view to the elimination or at least of the maximum reduction of the risk of negative effects following the use of vaccines in multiple doses, recommends the use of single-dose vaccines, given the concrete possibility that the military, given adulthood, is already immunized against some antigens contained in vaccines in multiple doses. "
"Particular attention is still recommended to the pre-vaccination history and the tests deemed necessary in doubtful cases or for any previous immunization."
For our children, not only is there no possibility of finding single-component vaccines, but there is also no possibility of having antibody tests prescribed to check for previous immunization.


Can the vaccine cause autism?

Given the sensitive issue, we believe it is correct to simply report what was written by the Commission and leave the conclusions to the individual:
Scientific studies have shown the neurotoxic effects of Aluminum27 in much lower quantities than those listed above. In this regard, please refer to the following study published in the Journal of Toxicol 2014; 2014: 491316. Doi: 10.1155 / 2014/491316. Epub 2014 Oct 2, entitled "Aluminum-induced entropy in biological systems: implications for neurological disease" by Shaw CA to others. The study also shows that: “Aluminum forms toxic complexes with other elements, such as fluorine, and negatively interacts with mercury, lead and glyphosate. Al has a negative impact on the central nervous system in all the species that have been studied, including humans. AL has a negative impact on the central nervous system in all species that have been studied, including humans. " Furthermore, in accordance with the findings of the commission in reading the dossiers provided by the pharmaceutical companies, it clarifies that humans are increasingly exposed to aluminum from various sources including vaccines. We also refer to the study published in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology at Volume 46, in March 2018, on pages 76-82, entitled: "Aluminum in brain tissue in autism" by Matthew Molda, Dorcas Umar, Andrew Kingc, Christopher Exley28, concerning the presence of aluminum in the brain tissue of children suffering from neurological diseases. The study found that "... The aluminum content in brain tissue in autistic subjects was consistently high. The mean aluminum content (standard deviation) on all 5 individuals for each lobe was 3,82 (5,42), 2,30 (2,00), 2,79 (4,05) and 3,82 ( 5,17) μg / g dry weight for the occipital, frontal, temporal and parietal lobes respectively. These are some of the highest values ​​for aluminum in human brain tissue [so far] recorded and one has to wonder why, for example, the aluminum content of the occipital lobe of a 15-year-old child would be 8,74 (11,59) μg / g dry weight .... ". Although the Commission is aware of the fact that adverse reactions differ between adults and children, it considers it appropriate not to underestimate the overall amount of aluminum administered to the military in the entire vaccine prophylaxis, since in adults the greatest degree of development of the immune and nervous systems at the time of vaccination, and the possible forms of physiological autoimmunity, they can favor the induction of lymphoproliferative type reactions and autoimmune diseases, as shown by the list of undesirable effects, adverse reactions and contraindications, contained in the technical data sheets prepared by the pharmaceutical companies.
Since many of the vaccines used are produced with cultures of cells and animal (chicken embryos) or human (fetal tissues, cell lines) and tissues, this contamination poses serious risks to human health, because it could be responsible for autoimmune reactions against DNA human. In particular, it is appropriate to recall the study from the thiole "Epidemiologic and Molecular Relationship Between Vaccine Manufacture and Autism Spectrum Disorder Prevalence" by Deisher TA, et al. Issues Law Med. 2015, in whose conclusions we read: “Vaccines produced in human fetal cell lines contain unacceptable levels of fetal DNA fragment contaminants. The human genome naturally contains regions susceptible to double strand break formation and insertional DNA mutagenesis. The "Wakefield shock" created a natural experiment that can demonstrate a causal relationship between vaccines manufactured from fetal cell lines and the prevalence of ASD "36. The Commission notes that the study is the result of laboratory analysis carried out on a vaccine included in the list of documentation delivered by AIFA, but in which no mention is made of this component.


In conclusion

Among the various pages of the report, which deserves the complete reading of Annex 1, there are concealments, bad medical practice, total or partial lack of common sense in vaccination practice. The thing that leaves most dismayed is the total absence of communication from the Mass Media, except in very rare cases, of the publication of the final report and its content, effectively omitting the part related to vaccinations.



The questions that Corvelva and the Venetian parents have been asking for 25 years are the same ones that the members of the Commission have asked themselves. We hope that we will not have to wait another 25 years to see the PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE applied.




  1. «(…) the Commission has preliminarily taken note of the absence of any scientific study in the literature aimed at evaluating the tolerability of the overall quantity of vaccine components with reference to adjuvants, preservatives, antigens and allergens, excipients and contaminants, also in relation to consequences in terms of hypersensitivity and adverse reactions already declared by the manufacturing industries for each single vaccine" (page 164)
  2. «The individual vaccines administered to the military, which we remember to be the same authorized by AIFA for the civil sector, contain adjuvants, preservatives and contaminants, within the limits of the authorizations for individual marketing. When a drug is authorized it is taken into account individually and the parameters, as well as the criteria, to determine the threshold beyond which a component becomes toxic, are determined by the fact that the drug is taken alone. However, in the present case we are faced with the administration of a vaccine calendar for mandatory prophylaxis, and not a single vaccination, therefore the drugs and their components add up. The verification that this sum still respects the thresholds of the individual vaccine is fundamental, because if it were not so, the military would be exposed to unnecessary risks of immunosuppression and adverse reactions (caused precisely by the foreign components of the active principle and by the active principle itself) »(Page 156)
  3. «From the calculations carried out by the Commission it emerged that at the end of the vaccine prophylaxis, the quantity of contaminants taken (calculated as Adjuvants + contaminants + excipients) is between about 8,32 and 8,42 g. However, this value is underestimated because biological contaminants - i.e. viruses, bacteria, mycoplasmas and mycobacteria, as well as fetal human DNA and animal DNA - which come from vaccine culture tissues have not been tested34. In this regard, in the article already in the Commission documents (New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro and Nanocontamination) there is a photo of the contamination of a vaccine with human / animal cells from the culture tissue "(page 164)
  4. "(...) the cumulative quantity of the various components of the vaccines exceeds the limit allowed for the marketing authorization of the individual vaccine (...)" (page 152)
  5. "In the light of what has emerged in the documents, the Commission finds the need to use more purified vaccines, so that the limit of the components in cumulative quantities falls within the limit allowed for the individual component of each vaccine, in the terms in which the prodromal studies to the individual MAs have recognized them as non-hazardous to health "(page 153)
  6. "From the analysis of the prospectuses it emerges that vaccines that have a high content of components in quantitative terms, but also of variety of foreign components, exhibit more adverse reactions" (page 137).
  7. "The Commission has found that the prescription of monovalent and single-dose vaccines, apart for the two trivalent MPR and TDP, appears to be respected. For the reasons already expressed in the interim report, and reiterated in the paragraphs above, the single-dose supply of the latter two also conforms to the precautionary principle "(page 184).
  8. «As can be seen from the table above, rather than an assessment of the tolerability of each individual element, the choice of carrying out an overall tolerability assessment for the vaccine to be administered may be practicable. This would also highlight the possible intolerance or hypersensitivity to allergens combined with each other "(page 172)
  9. "In confirmation of the need to adopt precautions for adverse reactions, it is finally observed that pharmaceutical companies require proportionately greater tests and verifications, the more they contain components unrelated to the active principle" (page 184)
  10. "To this end, the Commission suggests that the whole vaccine should be taken into account in the hypersensitivity assessment methodology instead of the individual component in order to verify the effects of the administration of the drug considered in its entirety. The assessment of hypersensitivity to the whole drug could be carried out in analogy to that relating to food intolerances, studying the lymphocyte reaction on the blood of the vaccinated, (...) "(page 184)
  11. "There are 22 indications to carry out pre-vaccination tests aimed at excluding the existence of any states of immunosuppression, 7 those that require the preventive evaluation of the efficiency or inefficiency of the immune system, 3 those referring to the need to exclude autoimmune diseases, 9 oncological diseases and, for various reasons, 11 that require a real analysis of the possible immunodeficiency "(page 168)
  12. "(...) the hypersensitivity indicated in the registration dossiers and technical attachments to the vaccines, even if only considered individually, confirm the need for pre-vaccination analyzes" (page 152)
  13. "On all the vaccines analyzed and included in the military vaccine prophylaxis, in addition to the active ingredient of the vaccine, there are 81 elements for which an assessment of sensitivity or allergy is foreseen" (page 168)
  14. "Secondly, the Commission insists on the need to reduce the risk due to the administration procedure, providing that they are entrusted to the national health structure and that at the time of enrollment, the soldiers who fail the pre-vaccination tests are excluded. These tests must detect any changes in the immune system and hypersensitivity "(page 153)
  15. "In particular, the pharmaceutical companies request the application of appropriate precautions for the use of the vaccine and, among other things, the verification of the state of health of the vaccinator and the absence of the diseases listed below at the time of vaccination" (p. 166 and later)
  16. «In the light of the elements gathered, the Commission confirms that there is a statistically significant association between neoplastic and lymphoproliferative pathologies, and other pathologies (eg autoimmune ones), and the administration of vaccines according to military vaccination prophylaxis. The Commission considers that it cannot exclude the causal link. " (page 154)

  17. "The adverse reactions indicated in the registration dossiers and technical annexes to vaccines, even if only individually considered, confirm the need for a personalized risk assessment on vaccine prophylaxis and the need for periodic long-term monitoring of each individual vaccinated." (Page 152) )
  18. "Although the Commission is aware of the fact that adverse reactions differ between adults and children, it believes it is right not to underestimate the overall amount of aluminum administered to the military in the entire vaccine prophylaxis, since in adults the greatest degree of development of the immune systems and nervous at the time of vaccination, and the possible forms of physiological autoimmunity, can favor the induction of lymphoproliferative-type reactions and autoimmune diseases, as is shown by the list of undesirable effects, adverse reactions and contraindications, contained in the technical sheets developed by the pharmaceutical companies . In this regard, see the specific paragraph Undesirable effects, adverse reactions and contraindications of this report. "(Page 158)
  19. «As already highlighted in the interim report of July, vaccination involves risks in terms of problems of immunosuppression, hyperimmunization, autoimmunity and hypersensitivity. This claim was confirmed by the analysis of public vaccine documents, such as package leaflets and data sheets (see point 4.4 of the SPC provided by AIFA), as summarized in the table below. "(Page 166)
  20. «From the analysis of the undesirable effects, of the adverse reactions and of the contraindications, important information emerged. In total, the reactions surveyed amounted to a good 240, with a frequency ranging from 10% to the "unknown frequency". "(Page 172)
  21. "It is also worth mentioning that the data transmitted by the manufacturing companies highlight the indication of a series of autoimmune diseases (indicated in bold and with an asterisk in the table) as undesirable effects or adverse reactions to vaccination." (Page 183)
  22. "It should be emphasized that the monitoring of adverse reactions is carried out in a very limited period after vaccination, which is why immediate adverse reactions are much more frequent, while rare reactions are related to pathologies longer term and which require a sample of very large population, often not reached in the marketing authorization phase. For this reason, non-acute adverse reactions are significantly underestimated. "(Pages 183-184)

Parliamentary Commission "Depleted Uranium" A minute of silence... A necessary premise must be made: the "Depleted Uranium" Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry was not created due to the particular sensitivity of Italian governments but was born in 2015 following a large number of cases of Italian soldiers ill with autoimmune or neoplastic pathologies or deceased. Among them we remember only one of the 2800 cases in which the Ministry of Defense and Health were involved for having caused injuries or death due to the compulsory administration of vaccines too close together and massively. Francesco Rinaldelli, corporal major of the Italian Army, Alpine of Potenza Picena. Died in 2008 at just 25 years old. (Sentence of the Administrative Court of Friuli Venezia-Giulia) Parliamentary Commission "Depleted Uranium" Some of the questions we have been asking for 25 years and which have finally had a parliamentary answer: (Link to the Final Report) Are vaccines safe for our children? The safety of vaccinations appears to be a necessary and fundamental certainty for anyone who wants to get vaccinated or vaccinate their child, especially in situations of obligation. There are no studies that confirm the safety of vaccines1. The Commission has identified several issues that cast serious doubt on the actual safety of any vaccine approved for military and civilian use (they are the same vaccines) in Italian territory, even if inoculated individually 2 The safety of vaccines administered simultaneously or without waiting for the necessary disposal times of adjuvants, excipients and contaminants causes an exponential increase in the risks associated with vaccination3-4-5. The safety of multiple vaccines, contrary to what has been maintained up to now by the "medical-political" class, has been questioned by the commission, even going so far as to ask for the adoption of only monovalent vaccines6-7. Any form of risk linked to a practice compulsory medical treatment, particularly if carried out on healthy children, cannot and must not be hidden, hidden or minimized, as is the practice followed daily by the State, Institutions and indoctrinated Medical Personnel. Are there pre-vaccination tests to prevent adverse reactions? Is there a way to prevent a serious and moderate adverse reaction in a healthy child?8-9-10 To date, negative responses have rained in, supported by nothing and arbitrarily decided11-12-13 by those who wanted to put our families at all costs in a critical and uncomfortable situation, in various respects. The Commission noted the importance of pre-vaccination clinical tests to the point of suggesting the exclusion from enlistment14 of subjects who do not pass these tests, underlining the insufficiency of the anamnestic form alone and of the informed consent completed by the soldier in question. site of vaccination administration, believing that the mere filling out of the form cannot be considered a substitute for the health checks requested by the vaccine manufacturing companies. Consequently, it is reasonable to think that a medical history of a 3-month-old child, based mainly on the possible family history of autoimmune diseases , immune depression or any pathology that could be a risk factor for vaccination, is not remotely sufficient15. But, ultimately, the pre-vaccination tests suggested by the pharmaceutical companies, for our Government and for the majority of its representatives, they do not exist. Are there serious adverse reactions to vaccines? The commission notes what we have all been shouting for years. The most honest answer that the institutions should give is: "we don't know because we don't monitor"16-17-18 and not only "we hinder spontaneous reporting in every way". There are too many cases of families devastated by a serious adverse event following vaccination 19-20-21 and not everyone has seen the damage to their children recognised. For these families it is not just a trivial economic recognition, although useful in various situations, but the recognition of truth and justice; the admission of guilt by a medical and political class that denies the evidence. Many of these families had not been adequately informed about the risk/benefit of vaccination practice by their pediatrician or even by the vaccinating doctor. Information can be found on the Internet and in books, of course! But it is a responsibility of the Medical Association and a precise task of any Doctor who defines himself as such, to ensure that his patient is at least aware of the risks he runs by undergoing medical practice. The issue is much more serious than that whatever you think. The Commission has highlighted the tendency to monitor adverse reactions in a very short period after vaccination22, associating this reason with the greater frequency of immediate adverse reactions compared to more long-term pathologies which are thus rare, declaring in no uncertain terms that non-acute adverse reactions, but not for this reason not serious, are significantly under estimated. It is not acceptable that the basic rights of humanity are denied in a state that defines itself as civilized. Not so much for an obligation that undermines the freedom of the individual, but for the lack of recognition and support of people who have developed serious illnesses following a practice that is strongly recommended and, today, once again mandatory. Does the number of vaccines administered affect the health of our children? They have imposed on us an obligation of at least 9 vaccines to see our children admitted to nursery schools and nursery schools, underlining that the immunized subject fulfills the vaccination obligation..., as a rule and in any case within the limits of the availability of the National Health Service, with vaccines in single-component or combined formulation in which the antigen for the infectious disease for which immunization exists is absent. Leaving aside the joke that vaccines in single-component formulation are not available and in combined formulation do not always exclude the disease for which it is already once natural immunization has occurred, we bring the damage to light. In recent months the mass media have told us over and over again that there is no risk if a naturally immunized child is vaccinated for that same disease. The Commission brutally refutes this thesis by stating that: "... to pursue the safety of the administration of vaccines, with a view to eliminating or at least maximizing the risk of negative effects resulting from the use of vaccines in multiple doses, it recommends the use of single-dose vaccines, given the concrete possibility that the soldier, given his adult age, is already immunized against some antigens contained in multiple-dose vaccines." doubtful cases or possible previous immunization.”For our children, not only is there no possibility of finding single-component vaccines, but there is not even the possibility of having antibody tests prescribed to verify previous immunization. Can the vaccine cause autism? Given the delicate topic, we believe it is correct to simply report what was written by the Commission and leave the conclusions to the individual: Scientific studies have demonstrated the neurotoxic effects of Aluminum27 in much lower quantities than those reported above. In this regard, we refer to the following study published in the Journal of Toxicol 2014;2014:491316. Doi: 10.1155/2014/491316. Epub 2014 Oct 2, entitled “Aluminum-induced entropy in biological systems: implications for neurological disease” by Shaw CA to others. The study highlights, among other things, that: “Aluminum forms toxic complexes with other elements, such as fluorine, and interacts negatively with mercury, lead and glyphosate. Al has a negative impact on the central nervous system in all species that have been studied, including humans. Al has a negative impact on the central nervous system in all species that have been studied, including humans.”. Furthermore, in accordance with what the commission found in reading the dossiers provided by the pharmaceutical companies, it clarifies that human beings are increasingly exposed to aluminum from various sources including vaccines. We also refer to the study published in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology in Volume 46, in March 2018, on pages 76-82, entitled: “Aluminium in brain tissue in autism” by Matthew Molda, Dorcas Umar, Andrew Kingc, Christopher Exley28, concerning the presence of Aluminum in the brain tissue of children suffering from neurological diseases. The study found that “…Aluminum content in brain tissue in autistic subjects was consistently high. The average aluminum content (standard deviation) across all 5 individuals for each lobe was 3,82 (5,42), 2,30 (2,00), 2,79 (4,05), and 3,82 ( 5,17) μg/g dry weight for the occipital, frontal, temporal and parietal lobes respectively. These are some of the highest values ​​for aluminum in human brain tissue [so far] recorded and one has to wonder why, for example, the aluminum content of the occipital lobe of a 15-year-old child would be 8,74 (11,59) μg / g of dry weight.....”. Although the Commission is aware of the fact that adverse reactions differ between adults and children, it believes it is necessary not to underestimate the overall quantity of Aluminum administered to soldiers in the entire vaccination prophylaxis, as in adults the greater degree of development of the immune and nervous systems at the time of vaccination, and the possible forms of physiological autoimmunity, can favor the induction of lymphoproliferative reactions and autoimmune diseases, as can be seen from the list of side effects, adverse reactions and contraindications contained in the technical data sheets prepared by the pharmaceutical companies. Since many of the vaccines used are produced with cultures of animal (chicken embryos) or human (fetal tissues, cell lines) cells and tissues, this contamination poses serious risks to human health, because it could be responsible for autoimmune reactions against the DNA human. In particular, it is worth recalling the study entitled “Epidemiologic and Molecular Relationship Between Vaccine Manufacture and Autism Spectrum Disorder Prevalence” by Deisher TA, et al. Issues Law Med. 2015, whose conclusions read: “Vaccines produced in human fetal cell lines contain unacceptable levels of fetal DNA fragment contaminants. The human genome naturally contains regions susceptible to double-strand break formation and DNA insertional mutagenesis. The “Wakefield Shock” created a natural experiment that may demonstrate a causal relationship between vaccines manufactured from fetal cell lines and the prevalence of ASD”36. The Commission notes that the study is the result of laboratory analysis carried out on a vaccine present in the list of documentation delivered by AIFA, but in which no mention is made of this component. In Conclusion Among the various pages of the report, which deserves a complete reading of Attachment 1, we can deduce concealments, bad medical practice, a total or partial lack of common sense in vaccination practice. The most dismaying thing is the total lack of communication by the mass media, except in very rare cases, of the publication of the final report and its contents, effectively omitting the part linked to vaccinations. 

The questions that Corvelva and Venetian parents have been asking themselves for 25 years are the same as those that the members of the Commission have asked themselves. Let's hope we don't have to wait another 25 years to see the PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE applied. References «The individual vaccines administered to the military, which we remind you are the same ones authorized by AIFA for the civilian sector, contain adjuvants, preservatives and contaminants, within the limits of the authorizations for individual marketing. When a drug is authorized it is taken into consideration individually and the parameters, as well as the criteria, to determine the threshold beyond which a component becomes toxic, are determined by whether the drug is taken alone. However, in this case we are faced with the administration of a vaccination schedule for compulsory prophylaxis, and not a single vaccination, therefore the drugs and their components add up. Verifying that this sum still respects the thresholds of the individual vaccine is fundamental, because if this were not the case the military would be exposed to unnecessary risks of immunosuppression phenomena and adverse reactions (caused precisely by the foreign components of the active ingredient and by the active ingredient itself) » (page 156) «From the calculations carried out by the Commission it emerged that at the end of the vaccination prophylaxis, the quantity of contaminants consumed (calculated as Adjuvants + contaminants + excipients) is between approximately 8,32 and 8,42 g. This value is, however, underestimated because the biological contaminants - i.e. viruses, bacteria, mycoplasmas and mycobacteria, as well as fetal human DNA and animal DNA - which come from the biological tissue culture of vaccines have not been tested34. In this regard, in the article already in the Commission's documents (New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro and Nanocontamination) there is a photo of the contamination of a vaccine with human/animal cells coming from culture tissue" (page 164) «(…) the cumulative quantity of the various components of the vaccines exceeds the limit permitted for the marketing authorization of the single vaccine (…)» (p. 152) «In light of what has emerged in the documents, the Commission finds the need to use more purified vaccines, so that the limit of the components in cumulative quantity falls within the limit allowed for the single component of each vaccine, in the terms in which the studies prodromal to the individual marketing authorizations have recognized them as not dangerous for health" (p. 153) «From the analysis of the prospectuses it emerges that vaccines that have a high content of components in quantitative terms, but also of variety of foreign components, present more adverse reactions» (p. 137) «The Commission found that the prescription of monovalent and single-dose vaccines, apart from the two trivalent MMR and TDP, appears to be respected. For the reasons already expressed in the interim report, and reiterated in the paragraphs above, the Commission also considers the monovalent single-dose supply of the latter two to be compliant with the precautionary principle" (p. 184) «As can be seen from the table above, rather than an assessment of the tolerability of each individual element, it may be possible to choose to carry out an overall tolerability assessment for the vaccine to be administered. In this way, the possible intolerance or hypersensitivity to combined allergens would also be highlighted" (page 172) «To confirm the need to take precautions against adverse reactions, it is finally noted that pharmaceutical companies require a proportionately greater number of preventive tests and checks, the more these contain components foreign to the active ingredient» (p. 184) «To this end, the Commission suggests that in the methodology for evaluating hypersensitivity, the entire vaccine should be taken into consideration instead of the single component in order to verify the effects of the administration of the drug considered in its entirety. The evaluation of hypersensitivity to the entire drug could be conducted in analogy to that relating to food intolerances, by studying the lymphocyte reaction on the blood of the person being vaccinated, (...)" (page 184) «There are 22 indications for carrying out pre-vaccination tests aimed at excluding the existence of any states of immunosuppression, 7 those which involve the preventive evaluation of the efficiency or inefficiency of the immune system, 3 those referring to the need to exclude diseases autoimmune, 9 oncological diseases and, for various reasons, 11 which require a real analysis of possible immunodeficiency" (page 168) «(...) the hypersensitivities indicated in the registration dossiers and technical annexes to the vaccines, even if only considered individually, confirm the need for pre-vaccination analyses» (p. 152) «Of all the vaccines analyzed and included in military vaccination prophylaxis, in addition to the active ingredient of the vaccine, there are 81 elements for which a sensitivity or allergy assessment is required» (p. 168) «Secondly, the Commission insists on the need to reduce the risk due to the administration procedure, providing that they are entrusted to the national health structure and that at the time of enlistment, soldiers who do not pass the pre-vaccination tests are excluded . These tests must detect any alterations in the immune system and hypersensitivities" (page 153) «In particular, pharmaceutical companies ask for the application of appropriate precautions when using the vaccine and, among other things, the verification of the health status of the person being vaccinated and the absence of the pathologies listed below at the time of vaccination» ( page 166 and subsequent) «In light of the elements collected, the Commission confirms that there is a statistically significant association between neoplastic and lymphoproliferative pathologies, and other pathologies (e.g. autoimmune ones), and the administration of vaccines according to military vaccination prophylaxis. The Commission considers that it cannot exclude a causal link." (page 154) «the adverse reactions indicated in the registration dossiers and technical attachments to the vaccines, even if considered individually, confirm the need for a personalized risk assessment on vaccination prophylaxis and the need for periodic long-term monitoring of each individual vaccinated.» (page 152) «Although the Commission is aware of the fact that adverse reactions differ between adults and children, it deems it necessary not to underestimate the overall quantity of Aluminum administered to soldiers in the entire vaccination prophylaxis, as in adults the greater degree of development of the systems immune and nervous system at the time of vaccination, and the possible forms of physiological autoimmunity, can favor the induction of lymphoproliferative reactions and autoimmune diseases, as shown by the list of undesirable effects, adverse reactions and contraindications, contained in the technical data sheets prepared by pharmaceutical companies. In this regard, see the specific paragraph Undesirable effects, adverse reactions and contraindications of this report.» (page 158) «As already highlighted in the July interim report, vaccination involves risks in terms of problems of immunosuppression, hyperimmunization, autoimmunity and hypersensitivity. This statement was confirmed by the analysis of public vaccine documents, such as information leaflets and technical data sheets (see point 4.4 of the RCP provided by AIFA), as summarized in the following table.» (page 166) «Important information emerged from the analysis of side effects, adverse reactions and contraindications. In total, the reactions recorded amount to 240, with a frequency varying from 10% to "unknown frequency". (page 172) «It should also be noted that the data transmitted by the manufacturing companies highlight the indication of a series of autoimmune diseases (indicated in bold and with an asterisk in the table) as side effects or adverse reactions to vaccination.» (page 183) «It should be underlined that the monitoring of adverse reactions is carried out in a very short period after vaccination, which is why immediate adverse reactions are much more frequent, while rare reactions relate to more long-term pathologies which require very large population sample, often not reached during the marketing authorization phase. For this reason, non-acute adverse reactions are significantly underestimated." (page

Corvelva

Publish the Menu module to "offcanvas" position. Here you can publish other modules as well.
Learn more.